Volt Brothers for Android
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Apple wins preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus in the US

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropical Island
    Posts
    10,947
    Total Thanks Given
    25
    Total Thanks Received
    13
    Total Thanked Posts
    10

    Exclamation Apple wins preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus in the US

    Apple found the right Judge...



    Just after Apple won a preliminary ban on sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1, well... seems that the Samsung Galaxy Nexus is next. Apple alleged that the phone violated 4 of its software patents.

    That's right, just after Judge Lucy Koh granted a preliminary ban on sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1, she's following it up with a similar granted request on the Galaxy Nexus.

    The judge ruled today in favor of granting Apple an injunction against Samsung's Galaxy Nexus phone.

    That's the same device Google handed out to developers just a couple of days ago at its I/O conference. Apple had requested an injunction against the smartphone in February, alleging that it infringed on several of its patents. An injunction would keep the Samsung device from being sold in stores in the U.S.

    According to Reuters' Dan Levine, the injunction can go into effect as soon as Apple posts a bond of "nearly $96 million." He added that the decision centered around U.S. Patent 8,086,604, which covers unified search functionality. Apple had cited three others in its original complaint.
    Here are the four Apple patents that Samsung infringed on:

    1. A means of detecting and marking up data like a phone number or an e-mail address, and then initiating a phone call or an e-mail when the linked data is clicked.

    2. A means of searching multiple databases and sources for data.

    3. A slide to unlock feature.

    4. An autocorrect-type function that completes the word as a user types and allows the user to accept or reject the word.
    The win is Apple's second against Samsung this week.

    Samsung said that it's disappointed in the decision. Apple is happy:

    In a statement, Samsung said that it's disappointed in the decision, and that it will take "all available measures, including legal action, to ensure the Galaxy Nexus remains available to consumers."

    An Apple representative reiterated the same statement the company has run with since it took aim at the South Korean technology giant in a patent-infringement suit last April.

    "It's no coincidence that Samsung's latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging," Apple said in an e-mailed statement. "This kind of blatant copying is wrong and, as we've said many times before, we need to protect Apple's intellectual property when companies steal our ideas."
    Google said earlier this week that the Galaxy Nexus would be one of the first devices to get the upcoming version of Android 4.1, and its practically their flagship phone.

    So, Samsung + Google Vs Apple. Who will win?

    NEWS SOURCE #1: Judge grants Apple an injunction against the Galaxy Nexus (via) ArsTechnica
    NEWS SOURCE #2: Judge-OK's Apple injunction on Samsung's Nexus phone (via) CNET

    Our thanks to 'Gauss' for this news item!
    -=( GaryOPA your friendly http://www.MAXCONSOLE.com v2.0 Admin )=-

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,092
    Total Thanks Given
    0
    Total Thanks Received
    7
    Total Thanked Posts
    4
    Does that mean every device Apple has ever made will be banned? You know, seeing as NOTHING they've ever put out has been their own creation, and has been based in whole, or part, on something else...usually open source stuff they've simply stolen.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropical Island
    Posts
    10,947
    Total Thanks Given
    25
    Total Thanks Received
    13
    Total Thanked Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by IJTF_Cinder View Post
    Does that mean every device Apple has ever made will be banned? You know, seeing as NOTHING they've ever put out has been their own creation, and has been based in whole, or part, on something else...usually open source stuff they've simply stolen.
    Yeah but the problem is they FILED the patent first, and got it granted, so it is theirs now, even if others built it or made it, or design it first. -- Just like their crazy wedge shaped hinge patent on netbooks, everyone was doing it first, but Apple filed it on the case design first, so now they can start going after every company that is making an ultrabook.

    He whom runs to the patent office first even it is for STAR shaped screwhead, wins!

    This reminds me of the '70s patent war, over TV tube gun masks, the SQUARE, vs. ROUND, vs. RECT. dots. -- One company patents the round, the other patents the square, the other patents the rect. and everyone sues everyone.
    -=( GaryOPA your friendly http://www.MAXCONSOLE.com v2.0 Admin )=-

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    West Yorks, UK
    Posts
    10,916
    Total Thanks Given
    35
    Total Thanks Received
    24
    Total Thanked Posts
    20
    apple seem to be taking the sony route, lower lawyers costs buy buying judges.




    Democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep meet
    to decide who is for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has a gun.

    I <3 Anne Robinson <3



    Welcome to maxconsole, where spammers get banned (at last)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    8,168
    Total Thanks Given
    0
    Total Thanks Received
    0
    Total Thanked Posts
    0
    .... *SIGH* I'm just quietly waiting for apple to patent breathing.
    LOL! The TROLLZ LIVE!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newport, South Wales
    Posts
    4,872
    Total Thanks Given
    3
    Total Thanks Received
    6
    Total Thanked Posts
    6
    Is the nexus that good then that it needs banning, after many years at the UKIPO I learned one thing, a good many patent infringment cases are not entirely about the infringement, well that and that all I got for the 150th Anniversary was a crappy tea cup and a party I couldn't go to as I had to stay cover the phones even tho I was only meant to do it for an hour then one of the others was meant to come back and do it, bastiches.
    My gaming systems -
    Consoles - Wii, Xbox 360 Elite, Xbox 360 Jtag Jasper 2TB 3.5" HDD, PS3 60GB UK launch version, PS3 hacked with 500GB 3.5" HDD (2TB wouldn't work ).

    PC - i7 3930K @4.6GHZ, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 2xRadeon 7970, 32GB DDR3, 4TB Raid HDD (4X Samsung Spinpoint F3, SSD boot drive OCZ Vertex 3 120GB )

    These are gaming systems I am biased towards (may as well throw in everything from last gen and before as if the PC can emulate it I am likley to have it)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    8,168
    Total Thanks Given
    0
    Total Thanks Received
    0
    Total Thanked Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DEDDOA View Post
    Is the nexus that good then that it needs banning...
    Yes it is... yes it is.
    LOL! The TROLLZ LIVE!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,748
    Total Thanks Given
    0
    Total Thanks Received
    0
    Total Thanked Posts
    0
    Wow cutthroat.
    [My links are not selling counterfeit products, and link to a genuine lawfirm, if people can make use of it, more the better. I have never spammed or flooded my posts with my "message". NEVER a single time. With all due respect, I hope you realise it takes all kinds to make this community. Some of us are schoolkids who link to manga websites, others have our own businesses who may link to it. Not all fingers are the same, and not everyone spams. Sincerely].

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts