New Apple TV will reportedly be called 'iPanel'

Discussion in 'Mobile Gaming World' started by GaryOPA, Apr 10, 2012.

By GaryOPA on Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM
  1. 21,854
    1,921
    113
    GaryOPA

    GaryOPA Master Phoenix Admin Staff Member Top-Dog Brass

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Media:
    10
    Occupation:
    Design Eng.
    Location:
    Tropical Island
    Home Page:
    And could be released this year.

    [​IMG]

    Analysts said that the new name of the Apple television set is iPanel and could be launched at the end of this year with and $800 price tag

    More info about the rumored Apple television set. Now, analyst Peter Misek of Jeffries has estimated a price tag of $800 for the upcoming device that will be launched at the end of 2012 under the most-probably name of iPanel.

    According to Redmondpie:

    Only time will tell if he was right.

    NEWS SOURCE #1: http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2012/04/05/apple-jefferies-ups-target-to-800-on-the-ipanel/
    NEWS SOURCE #2: http://www.redmondpie.com/apple’s-r...be-called-ipanel-will-be-available-this-year/

    Our thanks to 'Kaos2K' for this news story!
     

Comments

Discussion in 'Mobile Gaming World' started by GaryOPA, Apr 10, 2012.

    1. 888
      24
      0
      wewii

      wewii New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Mar 10, 2010
      Hooray Apple has a new product which they can now upgrade (uhmm... hold back basic features) every couple of months.

      Let me guess version 1 will be missing HDMI port (only vga/component)...
      so that version 2 can have one HDMI port.....
      so that version 3 can have 2 HDMI ports....
      so that version 4 will finally add a usb port....
      so that version 5 will have wifi (but no 3g)...
      so that version 6 will have 3g (but not 4g).....
      so that version 7 can have 4g (but no built in camera)....
      so that version 8 will have a camera (but not HD Cam).....
      so that version 9 will have an HD cam but not..... etc etc.
       
      Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2012
    2. 13,362
      959
      113
      billysastard

      billysastard MaxConsole Co-Admin Staff Member Top-Dog Brass

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2007
      Location:
      West Yorks, UK
      Home Page:
      who the hell is this marketed towards, you can buy a damned good tv for that money.
       
    3. 1,080
      94
      48
      Anil8tr

      Anil8tr Well-Known Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Jul 31, 2005
      You know exactly who this is marketed to: The iSheep. Those same people waiting on the deed to the bridge Apple sold them.
       
    4. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      Honestly billy, we don't not yet what that TV will sport inside... I think it will be more than an actual "SmartTV" such as the Samsung ones which actually cost around that amount or even more...
       
    5. 13,362
      959
      113
      billysastard

      billysastard MaxConsole Co-Admin Staff Member Top-Dog Brass

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2007
      Location:
      West Yorks, UK
      Home Page:
      not sure how smart it would be to buy an apple tv, not when recently you could buy the new lg PASSIVE 3d app enabled tv for around £250
       
    6. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      Really? 250 pounds? Cheaper than low-end TVs i see around here? What screen size are you talking about? If it is 32' or more please send me the link because i'm buying one right now :)
       
    7. 377
      3
      0
      Cyber Akuma

      Cyber Akuma New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Dec 7, 2005
      Its going to be a freaking iPad XL, you know it is. Its going to be nothing more than a tv running iOS, similar to the other Smart TVs out there. It will have one flashy but functionally useless feature just like every iOS device does, most likely run some crazy screen res that isn't either 4:3, 16:9 or 16:10 aspect, and have many standard ports and features missing. It will most likely also use displayport over VGA/HDMI and Thunderbolt over USB.

      Everyone and their grandmother will start making hardware and accessories for it, ignoring every other TV out there. It will be considered the best and most innovative tv EVAR!!!11oneoneone despite doing nothing new, and will in fact have several features missing and be more or less only designed to work with other Apple products withing using 3rd party solutions and being a general collasal hassle. Movies and accessories will start shipping defaulting to iTV settings or not including features every other TV has but the iTV does not have because who buys a who buys a TV that isn't made by Apple right? Apple is the only manufacturer of computers, phones, and tvs apparently.

      Streaming software like hulu and netflix and whatever will start favoring iTV and take forever, if EVER, to update them for non iTV standards.
       
    8. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      Yeah, and the iPhone was an augmented Nokia Symbian phone when it was released wasn't it? And the iPad just like all of those awkward tablet PCs that existed before which nobody bough, right? You say that Apple is not innovative but is selling millions of those things... Think about the "why" and stop hating ;).
       
    9. 377
      3
      0
      Cyber Akuma

      Cyber Akuma New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Dec 7, 2005
      Smartphones existed before the iPhone, I had several, the phone I had at the time the iPhone was released had more features and a higher res screen than even the later released 3G and 3GS versions. Hell, it even had more apps avaliable. Also, despite these phones being Windows Mobile, Android was already years in development before the iPhone came out. Basic features like GPS, setting your own ringtones, wallpaper, recording video, etc were all STANDARD on even the "free with contract" most basic of phones when the iPhone, lacking ALL of these features, came out. And people still acted as if it was the most amazing device on the planet. Never even mind smartphones, which cost LESS than an iPhone.

      Tablets existed just fine, they were just expensive, the tech wasn't there to make them cheap. If Apple putting a mobile OS in a tablet (and therefore limiting its functions severely) so innovative, why are people so excited that Windows 8 can being desktop-like power to a tablet?
       
    10. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      I think you are not understanding my point. Off course there were smartphones before the iPhone, like the Symbian ones i had but honestly they were much more "hard" to use and not very standar-user friendly as you need to search for the Apps outside the phone and then transfer it later from a computer (Just like the iPhone when the App store was not open) but the difference is that the user experience with the iPhone is much much better than with those smartphones and in my personal opinion much more than the actual Android ones. iOS simply does what it was intended for and does it smoothly and very well without complications.The thing that Apple did with the iPhone was approaching the smartphone concept to a wide audience of users including the ones who were "allergic to technology". They did the same with the iPad and possibly will do it again with the new TV or at least it was what Steve Jobs planned.
       
      Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2012
    11. 13,362
      959
      113
      billysastard

      billysastard MaxConsole Co-Admin Staff Member Top-Dog Brass

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2007
      Location:
      West Yorks, UK
      Home Page:
      sadly it was only 27", it was the LG DM2780D 27 inch 3D LED TV and its now gone up to £259 (with 2 pairs glasses and free shipping), still its great as a kids bedroom telly.
       
    12. 377
      3
      0
      Cyber Akuma

      Cyber Akuma New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Dec 7, 2005
      Actually, no, nothing like Symbian phones.

      I meant more like Windows Mobile and BlackberryOS phones.

      Symbian is actually the most popular OS for BASIC phones, not smartphones. Its not a smartphone OS.

      I also disagree on them being harder to use. windows CE/mobile was designed with a Windows Desktop version in mind, something that many people using one was familiar with, grated, this was deisnged for more product use in mind. Windows Mobile 6.1 made huge strides in the GUI being more appealing looking as well as easier to get information and navigate. On top of that, like Android, you could always load your own GUI shell on top of it. And you didn't need to use a computer to install apps. Yes, there was no apps store until after the iPhone, but there were thousnads of apps avaliable that you could download and install straight from the phone, no PC needed. I heavily disagree about the iPhone user interface being better as well. I feel it is a huge stem down due to its massively oversimplified nature. The entire GUI is basically the app drawer forced open. No customization, no widgets, no nothing. It took them until iOS 5 to realize "Hey, maybe displaying notifications on the completely vacant lock screen would be a good idea". Thats just ridiculus that it took that long to not make the lock screen just one giant blank "slide to unlock" widget.

      As for the iPad? That thign is nothing more than an iPod Touch XL. Why does everyone act like its so amazing? Its even less usable than an iPhone.
       
    13. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      Do you have a link for it? I'm really interested in an SmartTV to replace my 22" Samsung "dumbTV" hehe.

      EDIT: I found it on Amazon.co.uk with the 259 pound tag (314€) and free shipping but unfortunately on Amazon.es the price tag is 344€ and no free shipping. I really hate things like that. We are paying much more for the same products and are earning less monthly :(


      Did you realize that smartphones and tablets are intended to be easy to use? Controlled by touch gestures you need to access or run whatever you want in a quick way without using complicated menus or things like that. If you need all the things you mention on a smartphone i think is better to get a laptop.

      And Just one question. Have you ever tried an iPhone or an iPad for more than a week? I can assure that both devices worth every penny when you use it on a regular basis.
       
      Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2012
    14. 501
      24
      0
      Nicotine

      Nicotine New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Aug 21, 2005
      You're thinking of Samsung!

      iPhone - ONE a year. dare you take the time to look up Samsungs releases within the last year alone?..... they are already outdating the horrible Nexus (which I had, and gladly got rid of), with the GSIII, and the Nexus isn't even a year old yet.

      Samsung releases at LEAST one phone a month.
       
    15. 888
      24
      0
      wewii

      wewii New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Mar 10, 2010
      The fundamental difference between a Samsung upgrade and an Apple upgrade is that newer Samsung products don't make you feel like a jackass for not upgrading or buying late in the product life cycle.

      While Apple makes it seem like nothing else exists when a new iToy comes out. Thanks to all the iSheep out there and the brain washing marketing machine.
      Apple plays on people's shallow vanity to own the best and newest.


      Apple literally turns peoples values/thought processes into mush. When is the last time you heard of people selling their organs (kidneys) for a Samsung phone/tablet?

      OMG. You use iPhone 3... damn you must be a caveman from the stone age.
       
      Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2012
    16. 377
      3
      0
      Cyber Akuma

      Cyber Akuma New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Dec 7, 2005
      1. Thats why I specifically mentioned the UI improvements in Windows Mobile 6.1 that made it far easier and friendlier to use. Even before that though, it was using a Windows 95/98/xp-like UI, something that people are FAMILIAR with, and thus, wouldent be too tricky to use. BlackBerryOS likewise was simple to use as well.

      2. Apple keeps claimning that their iPhone sand iPads are ushering in a "Post-PC era", seriously, did you see their iPad 3 keynote? They kept saying Post-PC over and over as if it was a nervious tick. Phones and tablets can't possible do all a PC can, yet Apple wants to boast that they will replace PCs with their phones. So which is it?

      3. Tablets WERE meant to be both PCs and Tablets. Everyone was expecting the iPad to run MacOS, not iOS. They STILL make such computers too by the way, tablets that run a desktop OS. Windows 8 is pretty much bridging the gap by making an OS thats basically a desktop and tablet os at the same time.

      I have had an iPod Touch 4 for about a year and a half to nearly two years now actually, how do you think I am noticing all the flaws and issues with iOS if I didn't have such a device?

      Have you ever used a smartphone before iOS for a decent length of time? A lot of your accusations are completely inaccurate, starting with thinking Symbian is a smartphone OS.

      To be fair, the ONLY phone product Apple has is the iPhone.

      Samsung makes several Android, Windows Phone, and basic phone devices. They don't have a single cellphone product line. The Galaxy III is not the new model of the Galaxy Nexus, they are seperate product lines. New tech comes out, they make new phones. The old phone is not obselete yet, its just no longer top of the line, yet its still high up there for now, which happens with ANY computerized tech, not just cellphones. What, you expect them to only release a single phone a year just so people who purchased a phone feel like they are still on the edge while their competition overtakes them? Its not a Galaxy Nexus 2, its a different phone. That has newer tech, yes, which is to be expected for a phoen coming several months after another, even if its a different product line. Look at HTC, do you think the Evo 3D, Rezound, and One X are upgraded versions of the same device?
       
    17. 1,155
      30
      0
      Kaos2K

      Kaos2K New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2004
      Occupation:
      Molecular and biotechnology biologist, PhD student
      Location:
      Spain
      Home Page:
      Yeah, im totally innacutarate, Symbian is not a smartphone OS, is just for toasters and vending machines. :D

      From the wikipedia:

      I had a Nokia 6330 with Symbian and several other i dont remember before getting my first iPhone 3G. Furtermore i have an iPhone 4 and and iPad (and want to buy the ipad 3) now but also an HTC Magic, Nokia 5800 xpress music and a Galaxy Nexus with ICS and i can say i prefer much more the user experience the Apple products provide. And before you ask i have been always a Linux user but i currently use OS X for the same reasons i use iOS.
       
      Last edited by a moderator: Apr 11, 2012
    18. 13,362
      959
      113
      billysastard

      billysastard MaxConsole Co-Admin Staff Member Top-Dog Brass

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2007
      Location:
      West Yorks, UK
      Home Page:
      i had the symbian os on several phones including my trusty 9210, on that (because of its massive for the time screen) i used to use a front end called redshift commander (i think that was its name) that allowed me to run pretty much the same front end as i used on my pc making the transition between pc and smartphone seamless beyond anything out now, the only issue was that i had to shut it down to free memory if i wanted to run flash based stuff.
       
    19. 377
      3
      0
      Cyber Akuma

      Cyber Akuma New Member Loyal Member

      Joined:
      Dec 7, 2005
      Wikipedia is hardly flawless. They call them smartphones but really, they are more what the carriers call "feature phones" than smartphones. They typically don't even require a data plan while smartphones do. Yes, you can have a "smartphone" running nearly any OS you want, but Symbian was mostly used for flip phones.

      If I may ask, you keep using generic terms like "user experience" when referring to Apple products over their competition. Might I ask what exactly about iOS do you prefer over Android/BlackBerryOS/WebOS/WindowsPhone? If anything, iOS seems to have been playing catch-up the last few years. I already detailed several things it took iOS forever to get around to that their competition has had for a while.
       

Share This Page